So, not so long ago, there was a story about a plan the government had to increase the numbers of rejected asylum seekers who were deported. Apparently, many who fail to gain asylum still manage to stay in the country anyway. So, the impact of the policy was described solely in terms of absolute numbers of people who would be housed in camps and then deported. Year by year, the plan was for this number to increase. What annoyed me was that it was not at all clear what these numbers meant. Was the fact that they were increasing an indication that they were going to be handling a greater proportion of rejections in this way, or was it an indication that the number of rejections was going to go up as a proportion of the number of asylum seekers, or was it an indication that the number of asylum seekers was going to be increasing?
The whole story made me quite irritated. Talk about a classic case of innumeracy in public discourse. The Refugee Council didn't tell me enough to be able to figure it out either.
Comments