In any case, Howard's End is good because its characters are well-drawn, particularly the central character of Margaret Schlegel, and because the plot is good, and because it ends with the redemption of someone we want to see redeemed, and for whom we believe redemption is possible and not too unlikely.
Forster's big failing in The longest journey, the insertion of authorial voice propagandising in the cause of anti-urban Romanticism, only mars Howard's End once, and briefly. It's chilling reading "cosmopolitanism" being condemned, when the USSR used the phrase "(rootless) cosmopolitans" as a euphemism for Jews. I'd like to think that Forster wasn't an anti-Semite (I don't know one way or the other), but it's still creepy to read him using language that was later adopted for this purpose.
Comments